- Thread starter
- #21
klaptrapper
Guest
Air intake
Thanks, Tim, I couldn't remember the exact term for the pheonmenon. I suspect, though, that the O2 and MAF sensors are more sensitive to Carbon and O2 emissions than other mixture results.
Thanks, Tim, I couldn't remember the exact term for the pheonmenon. I suspect, though, that the O2 and MAF sensors are more sensitive to Carbon and O2 emissions than other mixture results.
Rusty, I believe the word you're looking for is, "stochiometric", not "stochastic"; i.e., the point where every molecule of fuel is optimally combined w/ the exact required amount of oxygen for complete combustion. Y'all are right in asserting that the stochiometric combustion (or leaner) will run the hottest. It's been my experience that manufacturers richen the mixture mapping to keep from burning either pistons or valves. Whether an air intake system will require remapping depends on the safety factor programmed in by the manufacturer's map. Once a choke point is lessened, something else becomes the limiting factor (exhaust capacity, fuel supply, valve size, etc.). If the Volant only uses up some of the safety factor, w/o causing the too-lean problems, it would not require remapping. The same is true, BTW, for those who have higher-capacity exhaust systems. Changing that out, when the intake is the actual choke point, doesn't deliver its potential. After changing out both the intake and the exhaust would, most likely, require the system to be tested, and remapped only if proven to be necessary.
The MAF sensor and 02 sensor would seem to mitigate any concern for the remapping issue. Increased air flow is detected, and lean combustion is identified. That's why they're on there. We didn't have the luxury of them on our high-performance motorcycles, so remapping was usually necessary when high-flow intake/exhaust systems were installed.
Tim