ccclarke
Seasoned Member
Just to clarify, the above-quoted post -attributed to me, is an amalgam of a reply to a reply, so all of the statements contained in it are not mine.
That being said, I'd like to add a dose of reality to this discussion for consideration and feedback.
The market will determine the ultimate success of this proposed project, but there are some areas that haven't been discussed to ascertain if it's worth moving forward or not.
Chiefly:
1. Mods to the Basic Design: There are two configurations of headlights to manufacture to support the XLR community. Those built before 2006 and those subsequently changed to incorporate the steerable projector bulbs contained in the Adaptive Forward Headlight enhancement. The connectors are different as well, though pigtail adapters are not as hard to build.
2. Numbers: Roughly 2/3's of XLR production occurred during the first two model years. This would favor building the 1st style over the second, even though a lot of the legwork is done for the first. The vendor needs to factor this in when deciding whether to proceed with a production run covering all XLR years.
3. Profit: How many would be sold at a price-point to justify the expense to build them? There's more than just 3D printing of the housing involved. Glass projector bulbs, metal shutters, linkages, etc. Metal parts can be printed, but those can be really expensive. I experienced this last year on a low-yield part and it was cheaper to have them machined traditionally, which was still expensive.
4. Advertising - this ties in with numbers and profit. How many current XLR owners are registered on this site? (The other two sites are effectively comatose.) If say, even 10% are aware of this site, (1500) and you have 10% of them ordering head lamps, (150) over an extended period of time, can the vendor make enough profit to justify the effort?
3D printing is great for just-in-time parts stocking; you only need to stock a couple of items for immediate shipment and crank out the rest as stock dwindles. This is great for easy-to design items that have higher yields and profit margins, but in this case, the market isn't very large. What's the lead time for glass projectors or the motors to move them --in the case of Adaptive Headlights?
5. R&D: eBay has headlights for as low as $200 all the way up to nearly $2000 listed at the moment. For <$500, the vendor could start, with the hope of recouping the development funds (labor, materials) later if demand warrants. Finding someone willing to part with a headlamp (or pair) that may or may not be in the same condition they were submitted (unless they're bad, and they don't care) for the promise of a new set is a risk. I'm not saying it can't be done, but I would want more assurance than a promise - An example of their completed work would be beneficial to get the party started.
I've seen a lot of good ideas coupled with great intentions blinded by the harsh light of reality. Being able to design and build something (Engineering) is one thing. Getting the word out and selling it at a fair price to make a profit (Marketing) is the deal-breaker. I want this idea to gain traction, but don't want to see anyone on either side get burned.
CC
That being said, I'd like to add a dose of reality to this discussion for consideration and feedback.
The market will determine the ultimate success of this proposed project, but there are some areas that haven't been discussed to ascertain if it's worth moving forward or not.
Chiefly:
1. Mods to the Basic Design: There are two configurations of headlights to manufacture to support the XLR community. Those built before 2006 and those subsequently changed to incorporate the steerable projector bulbs contained in the Adaptive Forward Headlight enhancement. The connectors are different as well, though pigtail adapters are not as hard to build.
2. Numbers: Roughly 2/3's of XLR production occurred during the first two model years. This would favor building the 1st style over the second, even though a lot of the legwork is done for the first. The vendor needs to factor this in when deciding whether to proceed with a production run covering all XLR years.
3. Profit: How many would be sold at a price-point to justify the expense to build them? There's more than just 3D printing of the housing involved. Glass projector bulbs, metal shutters, linkages, etc. Metal parts can be printed, but those can be really expensive. I experienced this last year on a low-yield part and it was cheaper to have them machined traditionally, which was still expensive.
4. Advertising - this ties in with numbers and profit. How many current XLR owners are registered on this site? (The other two sites are effectively comatose.) If say, even 10% are aware of this site, (1500) and you have 10% of them ordering head lamps, (150) over an extended period of time, can the vendor make enough profit to justify the effort?
3D printing is great for just-in-time parts stocking; you only need to stock a couple of items for immediate shipment and crank out the rest as stock dwindles. This is great for easy-to design items that have higher yields and profit margins, but in this case, the market isn't very large. What's the lead time for glass projectors or the motors to move them --in the case of Adaptive Headlights?
5. R&D: eBay has headlights for as low as $200 all the way up to nearly $2000 listed at the moment. For <$500, the vendor could start, with the hope of recouping the development funds (labor, materials) later if demand warrants. Finding someone willing to part with a headlamp (or pair) that may or may not be in the same condition they were submitted (unless they're bad, and they don't care) for the promise of a new set is a risk. I'm not saying it can't be done, but I would want more assurance than a promise - An example of their completed work would be beneficial to get the party started.
I've seen a lot of good ideas coupled with great intentions blinded by the harsh light of reality. Being able to design and build something (Engineering) is one thing. Getting the word out and selling it at a fair price to make a profit (Marketing) is the deal-breaker. I want this idea to gain traction, but don't want to see anyone on either side get burned.
CC

Last edited: