HTH, Good idea - at least weed out any principle level incompatibility. What PS fluids have you actually seen fail this test - or which ones did you know were incompatible? All the info I found seemed to agree with Cadillac Tech that there were no fundamental differences between PS fluids. Thanks.
I am being careful, or, if you prefer, 100% accurate.
It is easy for me to stand corrected on this, but I have an idea that Rolls Royce and Citroen use a different kind of fluid in their systems. I am on the edge of my knowledge and I do not speak from personal experience. It might be when there are more complex hydraulics fitted, most commonly for the suspension. Some power roof systems use brake fluid, that would be an example of a hydraulic system that would not be compatible with regular power steering fluid.
However, I do the miscibility test as a matter of course. If nothing else, it tells you you have taken the correct lid off! It guess it comes down to which hydaulic power fluid the manufacturer selects to use. There are many hydraulic power fluids that exist (aerospace, manufacturing etc etc), it makes sense that automotive use hits the standard one, but well, manufacturers are capable of about anything when it suits them.
At heart, the vast majority of automotive power steering fluids are modified ATF, if you were low and couldn't find power steering fluid, ATF would do at a pinch (after the miscibility test of course). Get it swapped for power steering fluid at the earliest opportunity. There are different additives.
A brief look at Wikipedia gives these two:
Automatic transmission fluid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - the discussion on how fluids have changed over the years offers some background on why fluids are not all the same
Power steering - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - mentions the Citroen experience. It is possible that Rolls Royce also used a similar suspension system (under licence). I know Rolls Royce built their auto transmissions under licence from GM/Oldsmobile.
My 2c worth.