The Porsche Carrera GT was known to be difficult to drive and very unforgiving. A very narrow "forgiveness band" with little warning of going past the envelope. Considering the number of owners, and very few miles this car had on it, I would be surprised the tires were not ate up with flat spots. If I were driving a car like this I would replace tires much more frequently. Goes back to doing what's right for the application.
Porsche Carrera GT in Walker crash had six owners in its cross-country life - Autoweek Racing car news - Autoweek
Porsche Carrera GT
Porsche Carrera GT
At the risk of making a mess of this, here are some notes about the hazards of low profile tires.
Start with an 'ordinary' tire. Lets give it a profile of 70% (technically its low profile, but not much). Lets go round a curve at a speed that is the limit of grip and give that a rating, I give it a 5. Just stay with me. Now, lets go a tad faster. The tire can't get round the curve but still grips at a value, lets call it 4.9. A bit faster again and the grip is lets say a 4.8. The thing to note here is that 4.9 and 4.8 isn't much less than the 5.0 I started with.
OK. Lets change that tire to a 35% ratio. Same curve. Same speed. Tire gives a grip of 5, enough to get round that curve. Lets go a bit faster. Good news, the tire gives a 5.5. Faster still and lets say the tire manages a 6. Lets assign that 6.0 as the limit, ie the 35% tire is gripping more in the curve. Sounds good hey? Now lets go a little faster. Whoa, the tire now gives a 5.0, a huge drop from that 6.0. Lets go a little faster still and wow, that tire is giving me a 3, that is lower than the standard tire I started with.
OK, I have made up the numbers, but the description is about right. A lower profile tire gives a higher grip in a curve than the more standard tire, but it does so by sacrificing the safety margin if you go too far. When it lets go, a very low profile tire lets go, no warning, no build up, no gentle recovery.
The top racing drivers can deal with this. Ordinary good drivers can't. There are far too many who think they can, but the bottom line is, they can't. Stabiltrac is a good thing, it tries to give the ordinary good driver more of the edge that a top racing driver has, never switch it off unless you really, really know why you are doing so. But it cannot beat the physics, ever.
Now, I know that the above has holes in it, I'm illustrating some of the concepts that form the compromise that is any vehicle. Yep, you can change this for that, but it always causes something else to happen, and most of the time the something else is not so good. Not always, because cars are also built to a price and there are things you can make better simply by spending more $$$. Generally, though the flip side is not so good. This isn't a problem if you know what you are getting into.
I run the rear anti-sway bar. The stiffer the rear of a car, the less margin for the switch from under-steer to over-steer there is (generalization). True over-steer is always a bad thing, it is very dangerous indeed and all manufacturers ensure that there are huge safety margins to avoid it. I know I have taken away a small amount of that margin, but it fixes a an undesirable behavior caused by the active suspension and there is still a healthy margin of under-steer left, so I'm OK with that, the problem with the active suspension is much worse than the slight loss of under-steer protection. Selecting lower profile tires involves a similar choice, but I don't see it discussed much. I don't like the ride quality of extra low profile tires, so prefer the 'correct' tires, but I know that that is my take. I like a very wide 'forgiveness band'.
Last edited: